<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fundamental Theorem of Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentfool.com/2007/10/06/the-fundamental-theorem-of-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentfool.com/2007/10/06/the-fundamental-theorem-of-email/</link>
	<description>...explorations in complex adaptive systems...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:50:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rafefurst</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2007/10/06/the-fundamental-theorem-of-email/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>rafefurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/the-fundamental-theorem-of-email/#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>I have tried the trick of only getting new email every, say hour or so.  And I suppose I could change that delay to once a day/week/month, whatever.  But then I&#039;d need to whitelist some people, and it becomes a game of whom to whitelist, and other things to clutter the mind with.  I&#039;ve also tried the GTD practice of having folders to triage the processing itself (as opposed to the archiving which is traditionally how folders are used).  But it doesn&#039;t seem to work for me and I get more anxious about whether I&#039;m overlooking something important since it&#039;s hidden in a folder, or I become undisciplined and the system becomes worthless.

I have a feeling I&#039;m not alone in this regard.  Thus, my approach is to change how I feel about the situation as opposed to change the situation to suit how I think I want to feel.  The former may ultimately be easier to accomplish and far less elusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried the trick of only getting new email every, say hour or so.  And I suppose I could change that delay to once a day/week/month, whatever.  But then I&#8217;d need to whitelist some people, and it becomes a game of whom to whitelist, and other things to clutter the mind with.  I&#8217;ve also tried the GTD practice of having folders to triage the processing itself (as opposed to the archiving which is traditionally how folders are used).  But it doesn&#8217;t seem to work for me and I get more anxious about whether I&#8217;m overlooking something important since it&#8217;s hidden in a folder, or I become undisciplined and the system becomes worthless.</p>
<p>I have a feeling I&#8217;m not alone in this regard.  Thus, my approach is to change how I feel about the situation as opposed to change the situation to suit how I think I want to feel.  The former may ultimately be easier to accomplish and far less elusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul P</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2007/10/06/the-fundamental-theorem-of-email/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/2007/10/06/the-fundamental-theorem-of-email/#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Have you tried delaying your incoming email? If there are people who must have instant access to you I guess you can whitelist them on through.  I found that simply waiting a week before I answer any given email (except on the monthly-or-so clean it all out days) works wonders to solve both the volume problem and the psychological problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried delaying your incoming email? If there are people who must have instant access to you I guess you can whitelist them on through.  I found that simply waiting a week before I answer any given email (except on the monthly-or-so clean it all out days) works wonders to solve both the volume problem and the psychological problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
