<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Superorganism and Singularity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/</link>
	<description>...explorations in complex adaptive systems...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Stocker</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Stocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/?p=544#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>Rafe,

You are right in the sense that this is a slightly overlooked topic within the study of Singularity. But mixing the concept of &#039;singular&#039; into it I think is way off. The two observations you made are also false.

Earth, its components, including humans and human technology supports a multitude of collective entities that already have, or potentially will gain consciousness in the future. The Lovelockian Gaia you are refferring to is one of them. But there&#039;s also the Global Consciousness Project, or social media networks that more and more faithfully resemble the synaptic mechanisms within the human brain. There may be many more we don&#039;t know about or that don&#039;t even exist yet. The components of all those entities may come from the same pool of agents, but they&#039;re different in many quantitative and qualitative properties.

However I like the way you identified the importance of individual awareness and communication. If we were to possess or develop a framework in which these entities become measurable and comparable we could anticipate the threats they may pose to us as individuals. The seeds of one such framework is outlined in http://collectiveweb.wordpress.com/category/global-consciousness/.

@DanielStocker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafe,</p>
<p>You are right in the sense that this is a slightly overlooked topic within the study of Singularity. But mixing the concept of &#8217;singular&#8217; into it I think is way off. The two observations you made are also false.</p>
<p>Earth, its components, including humans and human technology supports a multitude of collective entities that already have, or potentially will gain consciousness in the future. The Lovelockian Gaia you are refferring to is one of them. But there&#8217;s also the Global Consciousness Project, or social media networks that more and more faithfully resemble the synaptic mechanisms within the human brain. There may be many more we don&#8217;t know about or that don&#8217;t even exist yet. The components of all those entities may come from the same pool of agents, but they&#8217;re different in many quantitative and qualitative properties.</p>
<p>However I like the way you identified the importance of individual awareness and communication. If we were to possess or develop a framework in which these entities become measurable and comparable we could anticipate the threats they may pose to us as individuals. The seeds of one such framework is outlined in <a href="http://collectiveweb.wordpress.com/category/global-consciousness/" rel="nofollow">http://collectiveweb.wordpress.com/category/global-consciousness/</a>.</p>
<p>@DanielStocker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comments on Human Cultural Transformation &#171; The Emergent Fool</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/#comment-3815</link>
		<dc:creator>Comments on Human Cultural Transformation &#171; The Emergent Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/?p=544#comment-3815</guid>
		<description>[...] Superorganism and Singularity • Superorganism Considered Harmful • Response to Superorganism Considered Harmful • [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Superorganism and Singularity • Superorganism Considered Harmful • Response to Superorganism Considered Harmful • [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Save the Madagascar Rain Forest &#171; The Emergent Fool</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>Save the Madagascar Rain Forest &#171; The Emergent Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/?p=544#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>[...] that ant species are incredibly specialized to their local environment. (They are the prototypical superorganism after all.)  So the density of ant species should be a major component of any good proxy for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that ant species are incredibly specialized to their local environment. (They are the prototypical superorganism after all.)  So the density of ant species should be a major component of any good proxy for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leona</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Leona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/?p=544#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the &#039;gaia&#039; meme reinvents itself under different names to suit the times... and slowly extends beyond its original strictly geological context... but ultimately &#039;ole lovelock was right. Probably even righter than he knew.

I like the way you put the &#039;single&#039; into singularity. Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the &#8216;gaia&#8217; meme reinvents itself under different names to suit the times&#8230; and slowly extends beyond its original strictly geological context&#8230; but ultimately &#8216;ole lovelock was right. Probably even righter than he knew.</p>
<p>I like the way you put the &#8217;single&#8217; into singularity. Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Response to &#8220;Superorganism Considered Harmful&#8221; &#171; Complex Adaptive Systems</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Response to &#8220;Superorganism Considered Harmful&#8221; &#171; Complex Adaptive Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/?p=544#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>[...] 10, 2008 by rafefurst    This is a response to Kevin&#8217;s post responding to my post. Rafe makes an analogy to cells within a multicellular organism. How does this support the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10, 2008 by rafefurst    This is a response to Kevin&#8217;s post responding to my post. Rafe makes an analogy to cells within a multicellular organism. How does this support the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superorganism Considered Harmful &#171; Complex Adaptive Systems</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Superorganism Considered Harmful &#171; Complex Adaptive Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/?p=544#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>[...] December 1, 2008 by kevindick    Response to: Superorganism and Singularity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December 1, 2008 by kevindick    Response to: Superorganism and Singularity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Rich</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2008/11/25/superorganism-and-singularity/#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rafefurst.wordpress.com/?p=544#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>&quot;Comprising&quot; or &quot;composed of.&quot;
Never &quot;comprised of.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Comprising&#8221; or &#8220;composed of.&#8221;<br />
Never &#8220;comprised of.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
