<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter vs. Psychoanalysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentfool.com/2009/02/24/twitter-vs-psychoanalysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/02/24/twitter-vs-psychoanalysis/</link>
	<description>...explorations in complex adaptive systems...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:30:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brady</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/02/24/twitter-vs-psychoanalysis/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1082#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a lot more difficult to infer intentions and motives than either you or the quoted Docs above are acknowledging. I would like to know what kind of data you (or the psychologists) are relying on to infer these motives. Do we even have self-report??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a lot more difficult to infer intentions and motives than either you or the quoted Docs above are acknowledging. I would like to know what kind of data you (or the psychologists) are relying on to infer these motives. Do we even have self-report??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafefurst</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/02/24/twitter-vs-psychoanalysis/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>rafefurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1082#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>Point noted.  I use the term psychoanalysis to refer to the clinical variety, and to be clear, I am not speaking at all of experimental or cognitive psych above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point noted.  I use the term psychoanalysis to refer to the clinical variety, and to be clear, I am not speaking at all of experimental or cognitive psych above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevindick</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/02/24/twitter-vs-psychoanalysis/#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>kevindick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1082#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>My father would no doubt to implore you to distinguish between _clinical_ psychologists and _experimental_ psychologists here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My father would no doubt to implore you to distinguish between _clinical_ psychologists and _experimental_ psychologists here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
