<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disgusted with the California Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/</link>
	<description>...explorations in complex adaptive systems...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:50:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The California Bankruptcy Experiment &#124; Pontificus</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>The California Bankruptcy Experiment &#124; Pontificus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>[...] Disgusted with the California Budget &#8617; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Disgusted with the California Budget &#8617; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the California State Budget &#171; The Emergent Fool</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the California State Budget &#171; The Emergent Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-2092</guid>
		<description>[...] 25, 2009 by kevindick    A number of people responded to my recent post on the California budget. So I thought I&#8217;d dig a little deeper into the issue. The three [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 25, 2009 by kevindick    A number of people responded to my recent post on the California budget. So I thought I&#8217;d dig a little deeper into the issue. The three [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ace</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>@Terrence  $8200 per pupil for education.  If we estimate there are 30 kids per class then each teacher is &quot;generating&quot; $246,000 in revenue!  Let&#039;s subtract their salary of $30k.  &quot;Rent&quot; for a space of 1000 square feet would be another $30k.  $5k for furniture and $5k for supplies leaves $170,000 left over per classroom.

Let&#039;s assume that there are 20 classrooms per school.  We have $3,400,000.  We need some custodial help and say two managers.  Call that another $150,000 in salaries.

Anyway you see where I am going...this is a business I want to be in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Terrence  $8200 per pupil for education.  If we estimate there are 30 kids per class then each teacher is &#8220;generating&#8221; $246,000 in revenue!  Let&#8217;s subtract their salary of $30k.  &#8220;Rent&#8221; for a space of 1000 square feet would be another $30k.  $5k for furniture and $5k for supplies leaves $170,000 left over per classroom.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume that there are 20 classrooms per school.  We have $3,400,000.  We need some custodial help and say two managers.  Call that another $150,000 in salaries.</p>
<p>Anyway you see where I am going&#8230;this is a business I want to be in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Greenspan</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Greenspan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>@Terence: do you happen to know how these numbers were impacted by No Child Left Behind and/or Prop 13?

It seems to make intuitive sense that the combination of Federal mandate and a lack of any ability to raise money through property taxes, the typical source in this nation, would put the burden on the state government.

I&#039;d also be curious to see what impact rising health care costs have had overall. I tend to think that the increased cost of insuring state workers and caring for the uninsured over this time would be a terrible burden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Terence: do you happen to know how these numbers were impacted by No Child Left Behind and/or Prop 13?</p>
<p>It seems to make intuitive sense that the combination of Federal mandate and a lack of any ability to raise money through property taxes, the typical source in this nation, would put the burden on the state government.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also be curious to see what impact rising health care costs have had overall. I tend to think that the increased cost of insuring state workers and caring for the uninsured over this time would be a terrible burden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielhorowitz</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>danielhorowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>I think most states have significant increases in education expenditures over this time period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most states have significant increases in education expenditures over this time period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafefurst</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-2094</link>
		<dc:creator>rafefurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-2094</guid>
		<description>The kids part should be a good thing, one would think.  Is there any indication that the education system in CA is getting better since the increase?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kids part should be a good thing, one would think.  Is there any indication that the education system in CA is getting better since the increase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>So, I took at look at the state budget numbers (which won&#039;t indicate where any local spending increases may have come from), and here&#039;s an initial conclusion:  kids and criminals.  The state general fund spent about $58B in 1999, and about $90B in 2006.  The biggest source of increased spending is kids and criminals.  In 1999, per pupil K-14 spending was $5752.  By 2006, this had become $8244.  K-14 makes up the largest chunk of state spending, clocking in at $55B in 2006.

Another interesting increase is the cost of incarceration in CA.  Judiciary and criminal justice cost the state about $6.4B in 1999, and had grown to over $12B by 2006.  (There is upcoming non-discretionary spending coming up here because of the ruling that CA prisons have to build new health care facilities, which is going to tack somewhere around $8B to that number.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I took at look at the state budget numbers (which won&#8217;t indicate where any local spending increases may have come from), and here&#8217;s an initial conclusion:  kids and criminals.  The state general fund spent about $58B in 1999, and about $90B in 2006.  The biggest source of increased spending is kids and criminals.  In 1999, per pupil K-14 spending was $5752.  By 2006, this had become $8244.  K-14 makes up the largest chunk of state spending, clocking in at $55B in 2006.</p>
<p>Another interesting increase is the cost of incarceration in CA.  Judiciary and criminal justice cost the state about $6.4B in 1999, and had grown to over $12B by 2006.  (There is upcoming non-discretionary spending coming up here because of the ruling that CA prisons have to build new health care facilities, which is going to tack somewhere around $8B to that number.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafefurst</title>
		<link>http://emergentfool.com/2009/05/19/disgusted-with-the-california-budget/#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>rafefurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentfool.com/?p=1606#comment-2095</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis.

So where is the extra 38% going to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis.</p>
<p>So where is the extra 38% going to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
