Derek Abbott says
Australia alone could solve the world's current and future energy needs using solar thermal and liquid hydrogen.
Saul Griffith says, practically speaking
this is not feasible and we need to use all available clean energy technology
and reduce and conserve substantially or we are doomed. Who is "less wrong", Derek or Saul?
Related posts:
- Daniel Nocera’s Gift
- Global Economic Constitution?
- Global Warming
- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
- Balance the past with Zeitgeist
blog comments powered by